|
On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Till Maas
wrote:
Your argument sounds like yum.repos.d would be the best name for the
repo definitions that are recognised by the yum parser and other
implementations for this format.
More accurate and more distro agnostic would be <package
management system like rpm or npm etc >.repos.d or <file
format like rpm, npm etc >.repos.d not package management like
yum, dnf, zypper etc could all use that repository directory if that
would be the case
repos.d is to generic.
It's going to be interesting to see if fesco will be consistent in
their previous decision making or Red Hat NIH software of zypper
will get the special Red Hat corporate treatment from them.
JBG
|
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
