On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds. >> > Fundamentally, libsolv can process rpm-md/yum, susetags/yast2, hdlist2 >> > (mdk), and helix repos. And those are just the RPM repo formats. >> > libsolv can handle deb/apt, arch repos, and Haiku repos. We don't >> > really care too much about stuff other than rpm-md for now, but I >> > don't see why that couldn't change in the future. >> >> Even if we could, I don't think it would be a good idea to have a single >> drop-directory for all of them. That's introducing too much complexity on the >> behalf of the tools that have to parse them. >> >> So I think we should keep the directory limited to files that share a parser. >> I'm strongly in favor of the "rpm.repos.d" proposal, FWIW. (I agree that > > Your argument sounds like yum.repos.d would be the best name for the > repo definitions that are recognised by the yum parser and other > implementations for this format. Unless you still want to bundle > different repo definitions for different parsers in one directory. > > Regards > Till If we followed the logic of calling them by parsers, we'd call it /etc/solv.repos.d, since libsolv is the parser and it handles different types of repodata. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
