On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 26 April 2016 at 22:00, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time. >> > >> I realize this is inopportune, but it's best if we figure out *immediately* how >> we're going to handle this. >> >> >> Options: >> 1) Downgrade back to 4.x, downgrading or dropping any modules in the collection >> that don't run on that LTS version. >> 2) Stick with 5.x for the life of Fedora 24, handling security backports >> ourselves once it hits EOL this summer. >> 3) Upgrade to 6.x, fixing or dropping any modules in the collection that don't >> run on it yet. >> > > 4) Drop NodeJS from Fedora 24 altogether. If there isn't one already, > have a nodejs team built of people who are interested in it and are > committed to doing things like side builds and similar requirements. That would be a pretty big regression considering it has been in Fedora for a while. The user experience of needing nodejs and then having to hunt for it after upgrade seems poor. > They can then have a plan on what nodejs work should be done and what > plans they will align on. This would be similar to the perl/python and > other groups.. and makes sure that when someone bows out it doesn't > kill the entire stack until someone comes in to build the work again. I don't disagree having a nodejs team would be a good idea, but I think you're being a bit unfair to Stephen. He hasn't bowed out yet and even a well intentioned nodejs team could have made the same choices that led to this situation. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
