On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>> "PP" == Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich >> PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban >> PP> to all Fedoras. >> >> PP> Is that intentional? >> >> It's currently correct according to FESCo's request as I understood it. >> While f25 might still be able to compose, if the tools aren't fixed >> before the next branch then we'll have to back things out or end up back >> in a situation where we can't mash updates. >> > > I'd say it's fine for now. Our *hope* is that we will be able to support them > for F25 at some point, but composes *right now* probably don't work, so I think > this wording is fine. > > So you don't expect that mash could be fixed/replaced before the F24 release in June, then? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
