On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "PP" == Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich > PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban > PP> to all Fedoras. > > PP> Is that intentional? > > It's currently correct according to FESCo's request as I understood it. > While f25 might still be able to compose, if the tools aren't fixed > before the next branch then we'll have to back things out or end up back > in a situation where we can't mash updates. > I'd say it's fine for now. Our *hope* is that we will be able to support them for F25 at some point, but composes *right now* probably don't work, so I think this wording is fine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
