On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use rich > boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling can catch > up and allow us to push updates with them. > > Thanks for your cooperation. > > kevin > -- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593 > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-01/fesco.2016-04-01-17.00.log.html > To clarify, the use of rich dependencies is banned from use for Requires: and Recommends: dependencies. It is safe for use on Suggests:, Enhances: and Supplements:. In particular, this means that it is still acceptable to generate language subpackages using Supplements. ("Rich dependencies" refers to dependencies that specify "and" or "or" for extended rule-processing). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Langpacks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
