Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:11:24 -0400
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings. 
> > 
> > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run
> > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to
> > correctly handle these new dependencies.
> > 
> > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use
> > rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling
> > can catch up and allow us to push updates with them.   
> 
> Just to be clear.
> 
> Rich deps in Supplements are OK (yum parser ignores those).
> 
> And the language pack implementation needs no changes (uses rich deps
> in supplements).

Correct. 

kevin


Attachment: pgp7CXFcayHFX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux