Re: Two questions about Alpha release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:13:45 -0400
Eric Griffith <egriffith92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> uname -r says
> 
> 4.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
> 
> dnf info kernel:
> 
> Name        : kernel
> Arch        : x86_64
> Epoch       : 0
> Version     : 4.6.0
> Release     : 0.rc1.git0.1.fc25
> Size        : 0.0
> Repo        : @System
> From repo   : fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
> Summary     : The Linux kernel
> URL         : http://www.kernel.org/
> License     : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
> Description : The kernel meta package
> 
> 
> Asus UEFI says Secure Boot: Enabled. I'll play around with the
> firmware and see if I can't get it to fail to boot. Really bizarre.

Ah, I see. 

Since the first official rawhide kernel build of each rc has debugging
disabled, this kernel was just made available in the rawhide-nodebug
repo instead of making another non official build. 

So, yes, this kernel happens to be signed for secure boot. 

kevin

Attachment: pgptvUfbhQvud.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux