On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400
Eric Griffith <egriffith92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
>
> What's more interesting is.. I've got a system in front of me, and I
> just installed rawhide-nodebug on it. Recreated Grub, rebooted,
> picked that entry from the boot menu.. And it booted. Secure boot is
> enabled, those kernels aren't signed (according to the wiki),
> shouldn't Grub be screaming its head off about the kernel not being
> signed?
No, but your firmware shouldn't allow it to boot. I'd double check that
secure boot is enabled and that you are really booting a kernel from
rawhide-nodebug repo.
uname -r says
4.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
4.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
dnf info kernel:
Name : kernel
Arch : x86_64
Epoch : 0
Version : 4.6.0
Release : 0.rc1.git0.1.fc25
Size : 0.0
Repo : @System
From repo : fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
Summary : The Linux kernel
URL : http://www.kernel.org/
License : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
Description : The kernel meta package
Name : kernel
Arch : x86_64
Epoch : 0
Version : 4.6.0
Release : 0.rc1.git0.1.fc25
Size : 0.0
Repo : @System
From repo : fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug
Summary : The Linux kernel
URL : http://www.kernel.org/
License : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
Description : The kernel meta package
Asus UEFI says Secure Boot: Enabled. I'll play around with the firmware and see if I can't get it to fail to boot. Really bizarre.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
