On 15 March 2016 at 09:17, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm somewhat confused where the problem is. > This is the problem: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CI57RU5TGQZFGVTUJKM6S6WU2NU4VION/ This isn't anything to do with the gnome-shell version being different to the other components. > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/I47GW5IGT55JIOIGYJOSXFDT5WTBBA2L/ That wouldn't have been prevented using a side-tag either. Bugs happen in development software, holding the push for an extra week wouldn't have magically fixed that bug. > IOW you are keep changing API/ABI without proper .so name bumps and at > the same time, you refuse to use side tag (which would limit the impact) > for Rawhide builds. Okay, so the obvious solution is "don't put ABI-unstable development GNOME packages into rawhide". We'd then be using a xdg-app enhanced atomic image for all development, and then rawhide would rot. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
