Re: GNOME 3.19.92 megaupdate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 15.3.2016 v 10:03 Richard Hughes napsal(a):
> On 15 March 2016 at 08:53, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> so it would be little extra effort for you to do that same for f25/rawhide.
> I'm a bit confused where the problem is, at least my workflow is:
>
> * build latest release for rawhide

This should be "build latest release for rawhide in f25-gnome side tag".

> * if gnome-3.19.*, cherry-pick to f24
> * if we're using bohdi, build for f24-gnome, else build for f24
>
> I'm somewhat confused where the problem is.

This is the problem:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CI57RU5TGQZFGVTUJKM6S6WU2NU4VION/

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CI57RU5TGQZFGVTUJKM6S6WU2NU4VION/

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/I47GW5IGT55JIOIGYJOSXFDT5WTBBA2L/

IOW you are keep changing API/ABI without proper .so name bumps and at
the same time, you refuse to use side tag (which would limit the impact)
for Rawhide builds.


Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux