On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:29:29 +0100 Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On St, 2016-02-17 at 05:52 +0000, Christopher wrote: > > I just ran into this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=130 9175 > > It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and > > for > > other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the > > mismatch > > between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, > > like gpg-agent, are tailored for gpg2. > > > > RHEL/CentOS has shipped /usr/bin/gpg with gnupg2 since at least > > sometime in > > RHEL6. > > I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to ship gnupg1, but can we at > > least > > rename it, so gnupg package is version 2, and gnupg1 provides > > /usr/bin/gpg1 > > instead? This seems overdue. Is there any reason not to do this? > > I am in favor of changing the default too. The question is whether it > is not too late for Fedora 24 as I'd say this should be a Fedora > Change and we are past the deadline for Changes proposals. So this > will have to be postponed to Fedora 25. Yeah, I'm in favor too. Perhaps you could file this change/start working on it just after we branch f24? kevin
Attachment:
pgpe8rDMR2SSS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
