On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:52:45AM +0000, Christopher wrote: > I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175 > It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and for > other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the mismatch > between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like > gpg-agent, are tailored for gpg2. > > RHEL/CentOS has shipped /usr/bin/gpg with gnupg2 since at least sometime in > RHEL6. Which was a mistake, in my opinion. > I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to ship gnupg1, but can we at least > rename it, so gnupg package is version 2, and gnupg1 provides /usr/bin/gpg1 > instead? This seems overdue. Is there any reason not to do this? I am opposed to this. If a tool wants/needs to use v2 it should be using gpg2 not gpg. gpg v1.4.x is still active upstream and is shipped as gpg so we shouldn't be renaming it. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
