On St, 2016-02-17 at 05:52 +0000, Christopher wrote: > I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=130 > 9175 > It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and > for > other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the > mismatch > between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like > gpg-agent, are tailored for gpg2. > > RHEL/CentOS has shipped /usr/bin/gpg with gnupg2 since at least > sometime in > RHEL6. > I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to ship gnupg1, but can we at > least > rename it, so gnupg package is version 2, and gnupg1 provides > /usr/bin/gpg1 > instead? This seems overdue. Is there any reason not to do this? I am in favor of changing the default too. The question is whether it is not too late for Fedora 24 as I'd say this should be a Fedora Change and we are past the deadline for Changes proposals. So this will have to be postponed to Fedora 25. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb (You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
