Hi Alex, On Sa, Feb 13, 2016 at 09:43:06 -0800, Alex Gagniuc wrote: > I was in the process of upgrading to the latest upstream releases, > which came out about a week ago. You've interrupted the process by > pushing some unrelated changes, and now I have to figure out what the changes were not unrelated but fixed the build error for pulseview on Rawhide and extending the build overrides fixed the build errors on F23 (which you can also read in the changelog). > You've done that without any attempt at contacting me. There are This is not true, since I tried to contact you via IRC. > I've considered what to do next in order to complete upgrading to the > shiniest upstream release. I've decided that I will revert your > changes, and continue the process where I left it off. If you think that is the best way forward, please do it. But please make sure that you also restore compliance to the packaging guidelines by starting the release with 1 and using the %license macro. Also pushing dependent builds in separate updates is against best practices as this will lead to broken updates. Kind regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx