On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:18:03PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote: > On 01/29/2016 05:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm still unclear why you don't just use sqlite 3. > > Among other things it is about 2 times lower than the current BDB > implementation. There's some question [see adjacent message in this thread] about whether that was measuring sqlite 2 or 3. Will a custom database implementation be any faster? And will it solve all the other problems, such as reliability, flexibility, backwards compatibility, that sqlite already solves? Sqlite gets this stuff right. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
