Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/01/16 11:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
The list is correct according to PackageDB. I don't rememeber if anyone
ever initiated the non-responsive packager process for athimm or
chitlesh.

I don't know if somebody filed one against athimm (I had thought so),
but I am the one who filed one against chitlesh
(https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484).

orion filed one for athimm:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417

Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux