Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Ralf.

On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

fakeroot (athimm, rathann, corsepiu, moceap)

Are you sure the owners list you used is current? I stepped down as
fakeroot maintainer and removed myself many months ago.

While you're not listed as POC anymore, you're still listed as committer
for rawhide, F23 and F22 branches of fakeroot, so the list above is
correct.
Crap, I wish fedora had a usable pkgdb UI ;)

While we're at it: Did you notice that this package is completely messed up? I guess, I am going to BZ it.

Also, I noticed a number of maintainers on your list, whose accounts
should have been closed down (AWOL) and their package ownership
probably be removed (athimm is one example of such case, chitlesh
would be another one). What's going on here?

The list is correct according to PackageDB. I don't rememeber if anyone
ever initiated the non-responsive packager process for athimm or
chitlesh.

I don't know if somebody filed one against athimm (I had thought so), but I am the one who filed one against chitlesh (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1484).


Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux