On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:22:29PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Richard Fearn <richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/763 > >> > > >> > You beat me to it :) Thanks for doing that! > >> > > >> > And Luke seems to have fixed the problem already. Thanks Luke! > >> > >> He fixed the code, but it isn't merged yet nor is it deployed in > >> Fedora Infrastructure from what I can tell. > > > > The fix is now in production. > > > > Sorry about the annoying regression, folks. Bodhi previously would avoid > > obsoleting updates that had an open request, even if it hasn't gotten > > pulled into a push yet. A recent improvement to this logic allows for > > updates with a testing request to get obsoleted if a newer update gets > > submitted before it gets "locked" into a push. The bug that snuck in > > allowed this to happen to unlocked updates with a stable request too. > > Thanks for the explanation and the quick fix, Luke. +1, thanks Luke! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
