Hi, Until yesterday I had two findbugs-contrib 6.4.0 updates in testing: findbugs-contrib-6.4.0-1.fc22 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-36b05c38b8 findbugs-contrib-6.4.0-1.fc23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1e04f3b5f5 I submitted the F22 update for stable at 12:02:54, and submitted the F23 update for stable at 12:03:00. A little while later I created new updates for testing, for version 6.4.3: findbugs-contrib-6.4.3-1.fc22 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-578a14be73 findbugs-contrib-6.4.3-1.fc23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-670e467497 When I looked at the F23 6.4.3 update, I noticed it included all the notes from the 6.4.0 update. I thought I'd selected something incorrectly. So I edited it, unticked the "6.4.0 is available" bug, and removed the 6.4.0 details from the notes. (That's why the update was edited at 14:49:55.) Later I realised that the F23 6.4.3 update had obsoleted the F23 6.4.0 update - hence why it had inherited the 6.4.0 bug and notes. I was surprised that this happened :) I understand that I'd only *submitted* the 6.4.0 F23 update for stable; it hadn't actually been *pushed* to stable when I created the 6.4.3 update. But still, I have a couple of questions: 1) Is it sensible for an update, that has been submitted for stable, to then be obsoleted by a subsequent update? 2) Why was the F23 behaviour different to the F22 behaviour? I thought perhaps that I'd set up the F23 6.4.3 update incorrectly, but as far as I can tell, I only selected bug 1291027 (the bug about 6.4.3), and the findbugs-contrib-6.4.3-1.fc23 build. Regards, Richard -- Richard Fearn richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
