On 26.12.2015 22:02, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:37:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> For fun, what was there: >> >> %ifos linux >> %define _bindir /bin >> %endif >> >> Wow. I can't imagine the original purpose of that block, or how long >> ago it must have been added. >> >> However, why not actually remove it completely? What Fedora or EL >> release is not going to have _bindir defined? > > %_bindir is not /bin > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Is there some reason why should be the script listed in rpm with "path" /bin instead of /usr/bin? Ok, I am not sure what about few packages (list below) which require /bin/sed instead of "sed" package. It's possible, that sed will not be found correctly for them and may there should be set provides of "/bin/sed" too in that case. I haven't try that yet. What is your opinion? Use of actual paths seems correctly for me. Packages which require directly /bin/sed: libnetdude libpcapnav mod_fcgid os-prober policycoreutils redhat-lsb resource-agents xchat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
