On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:20:27 +0100 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dne 7.12.2015 v 11:56 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > On 12/07/2015 11:42 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Can somebody explain me why Rawhide comps are called F24? Trying > >> to use "git blame" and surprisingly (or not that much), almost > >> every line was created by Kevin Fenzi. Why we are using git if we > >> break the history this way? How can I find what was reason to add > >> something, unless I really want to dig through history of every > >> comps file. > >> > >> A would appreciate if the comps-f24.xml.in could be renamed to > >> comps-rawhide.xml.in to keep the history. > > Another way might be to use git branches instead of separate files: > > have 'master' branch for rawhide, 'f23' for Fedora 23 etc and use > > the same file name (comps.xml.in) in all the branches. That would > > be analogous to the way the packages git is set up. > > > > This would make it much easier to put the same change to different > > branches (just use 'git cherry-pick', instead of having to do the > > same change several times in different files as is now) and would > > make it easier to use 'git blame' for the history. > > > > Even better. I just mildly remember this was already proposed and > rejected, can't find where and why :/ I think it was just setup this way long ago and it's effort to change it. If there's people willing to do the work, I personally have no objection. Might be good to run past the releng list and fesco tho. kevin
Attachment:
pgp2yw79prXak.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
