FYI, this discussion might be better on the actual epel-devel list... On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:17:54 +0000 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: ...snip... > > Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option? > > This way you introduce back the version that was present without > > conflicting with RHEL. Only if it's a actual different so version. Is it? If not, why can't you use the version RHEL is shipping? > Could probably do something like what happens with packages that RHEL > doesn't ship for all architectures: the RHEL SRPM is cloned into > EPEL, the release field has "0." prepended to it to ensure that the > RHEL version is preferred where available, and the resulting package > built and shipped. I don't think thats allowed. The package is in rhel, you cannot ship it in EPEL just to be a different version. kevin
Attachment:
pgpXo8mqrRZkW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
