-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2015 01:43 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>> "DW" == Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not >> that many DW> other things require newt, and nmcli is always >> going to be there DW> anyway. >> >> For some reason I thought NM-tui _was_ nmcli. There's no reason >> to have anything other than the command line tool in server, >> indeed. Some might argue that you don't even need that since you >> can just edit some files and restart. Are any deps there just >> because of nmcli? > > The only additional dep nmcli pulls in is a readline library. > Just for the record, we do not actually include NetworkManager-tui in the default Server install. We only have NetworkManager (which includes nmcli) and NetworkManager-libnm. We have had *requests*[1] to include NetworkManger-tui in the default install, which I keep forgetting to discuss with the Server SIG, but thus far we have not included it. My personal feeling is that we shouldn't need NM-tui if we have Cockpit (though I acknowledge that the latter is nowhere near as feature-complete). [1] Most recently was from Dennis Gilmore who was asserting that he needed it because nmcli couldn't create new interfaces. I'm pretty sure that's incorrect, but I didn't have a handy pointer to give him. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZMyoAACgkQeiVVYja6o6MEvACfY4aCV9WheaxdlhKjHR0gKc9r kW4An38yfAAqDJ10ekgX1f+RDkmFKC2C =NPrc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
