Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 10.11.2015 um 00:52 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
about money: with the energy costs i saved going away from P4 computers many
years ago my current one is already paied

Nobody is saying that a newer computer won't save you money on the
power bill. What they have repeatedly stated and for some (first
world, perhaps?) reason you refuse to acknowledge, is that you can't
trade future power use for a new computer; you have to pay up front,
it's a sort of investment, that not everyone is affluent enough to
make. Not every person or institution can afford to get a new Phenom
or Xeon or whatever every year, or even every X years.
What exactly do you suggest these people do? Get LFS, Gentoo or Arch
and clear all incompatible flags? Or should they apply for a loan to
their bank, detailing the ROI from reduced power usage?

i would suggest NOT use a fast moving distribution like Fedora for such antique hardware

why do you ask again when i statet *more than once* that i have zero understaind for combine more than 10 years old hardware with a bleeding-edge distribution and then demand the bleeding-edge distribution to support that hardware the next 20 years instead move forward

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux