On 11/04/2015 06:37 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: >>>> I feel this is a better way to handle these issues >>>>> than the bootstrapping option (which will be >>>>> reverted from nfs-utils). >>> I think I've addressed these. >>> >>> But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and >>> autofs to ensure everything still builds properly when it's >>> reverted, >>> correct? >>> >> I already verified both fedfs-utils and autofs build without nfs >> -utils, >> but nfs-utils is still required to install fedfs-client and fedfs >> -server. > > Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw. > > It makes sense for fedfs-utils-client and fedfs-utils-server to require > nfs-utils doesn't it? Yes... I think so... steved. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
