On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > I feel this is a better way to handle these issues > > > > than the bootstrapping option (which will be > > > > reverted from nfs-utils). > > I think I've addressed these. > > > > But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and > > autofs to ensure everything still builds properly when it's > > reverted, > > correct? > > > I already verified both fedfs-utils and autofs build without nfs > -utils, > but nfs-utils is still required to install fedfs-client and fedfs > -server. Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw. It makes sense for fedfs-utils-client and fedfs-utils-server to require nfs-utils doesn't it? Ian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
