On 11/02/2015 11:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/02/2015 03:23 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> On 10/30/2015 12:24 PM, Florian Festi wrote: >>> I moved the directory over in rawhide (rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.8.fc24). It is >>> probably a bit late for F23. Shall I clone the bug for >>> javapackages-tools, rpm-mpi-hooks, supermin-devel to get them adjusted >>> or can you take care of them on your own? >> >> I have just fixed javapackages-tools upstream [1] by adding missing >> directory ownership. The change will propagate to rawhide with next >> upstream release. >> >> [1] https://github.com/mizdebsk/javapackages/commit/4cfed9e >> > > I think you missed a bit of the point. There is no need to require rpm since > *everything* implicitly requires rpm, so there is no need to own those > directories. Initially I assumed so -- that's why javapackages-tools didn't own these directories. It only owned fileattrs directory, which was installed by rpm-build. Now I re-read packaging guidelines part about directory ownership [1], which implies that package installing file to directory not owned by filesystem or man packages should own the directory, unless it requires package owning the directory. I didn't find anything about implicit dependency on rpm. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
