Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for use when
building rpms.  Currently that directory is owned by:

rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64
javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch

Of the various packages on my machine that install files there:

gstreamer1-1.6.0-2.fc23.x86_64
javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch
kde-settings-23-7.fc23.noarch
nodejs-0.10.36-4.fc23.x86_64
perl-generators-1.06-1.fc23.noarch
python3-cups-1.9.72-2.fc23.x86_64
redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.noarch
rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64
rpm-mpi-hooks-3-2.fc23.noarch

only rpm-mpi-hooks requires rpm-build for directory ownership, while
javapackages-tools takes the route of owning the directory.  However, I'd
rather rpm-mpi-hooks not require rpm-build as it's not really necessary other
than for this directory.  The simple thing I think would be for rpm to own the
directory.  Does that seem reasonable?

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux