On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:06:01PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for use when > building rpms. Currently that directory is owned by: > > rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 > javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch > > Of the various packages on my machine that install files there: > > gstreamer1-1.6.0-2.fc23.x86_64 > javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch > kde-settings-23-7.fc23.noarch > nodejs-0.10.36-4.fc23.x86_64 > perl-generators-1.06-1.fc23.noarch > python3-cups-1.9.72-2.fc23.x86_64 > redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.noarch > rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64 > rpm-mpi-hooks-3-2.fc23.noarch > > only rpm-mpi-hooks requires rpm-build for directory ownership, while > javapackages-tools takes the route of owning the directory. However, I'd > rather rpm-mpi-hooks not require rpm-build as it's not really necessary other > than for this directory. The simple thing I think would be for rpm to own the > directory. Does that seem reasonable? +1 to not having dependencies on non-trivial packages for the sake of directory ownership. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
