On 29.10.2015 18:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:44:55 +0100
Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25.09.2015 23:46, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Well, then adding the i686 build to the mash x86_64 multilib
compose whitelist
cannot be avoided -- as it's needed to really fix #1068620.
Okay thanks - https://pagure.io/mash/issue/4.
Been a couple of weeks, is pagure being actively used for tracking
mash requests?
yes.
However:
1) There's some kind of big release releng is working on.
Something 23? It's taking up a lot of their time. ;)
2) I think there's a pagure issue here where PR's aren't notifying
people who can merge them. I didn't see any notice of this one...
Will try and file a ticket on that.
No stress, was just wondering. Thanks for the reply.
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
