On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:44:55 +0100 Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25.09.2015 23:46, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> > >> Well, then adding the i686 build to the mash x86_64 multilib > >> compose whitelist > >> cannot be avoided -- as it's needed to really fix #1068620. > > Okay thanks - https://pagure.io/mash/issue/4. > Been a couple of weeks, is pagure being actively used for tracking > mash requests? yes. However: 1) There's some kind of big release releng is working on. Something 23? It's taking up a lot of their time. ;) 2) I think there's a pagure issue here where PR's aren't notifying people who can merge them. I didn't see any notice of this one... Will try and file a ticket on that. kevin
Attachment:
pgpQFO_pyGVZS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
