Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 29.10.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync.

[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677

yep, so not distro-sync

nonsense when i read the bugreport

* system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach)

THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by implement it that way after *many years* of "yum --releasever=XX distro-sync" works absolutely relieable

* change "dnf update" mode during system upgrade to
  "dnf distro-sync --allowerasing"

THAT is the right direction but nonsense because --allowerasing is a terrible idea, anyways "dnf --releasever=XX distro-sync" is not affected by both wrong solutions as far as i see (expect DNF is intentionally or unintenioally broken elsewhere there)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux