On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 13:44 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.10.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >> You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. > >> > >> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > > > > yep, so not distro-sync > > nonsense when i read the bugreport > > * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) > > THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by > implement it that way after *many years* of "yum --releasever=XX > distro-sync" works absolutely relieable > > * change "dnf update" mode during system upgrade to > "dnf distro-sync --allowerasing" > > THAT is the right direction but nonsense because --allowerasing is a > terrible idea, anyways "dnf --releasever=XX distro-sync" is not affected > by both wrong solutions as far as i see (expect DNF is intentionally or > unintenioally broken elsewhere there) You need --allowerasing for updates which obsolete other packages, if not you can't update. distro-sync can downgrading packages which in upgrading is not the best place . You can do it after upgrade the system . dnf update --allowerasing is what I want /need . -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
