On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 01:44:34PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > >On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >>You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync. > >> > >>[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 > > > >yep, so not distro-sync > > nonsense when i read the bugreport > > * system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach) > > THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by > implement it that way after *many years* of "yum --releasever=XX > distro-sync" works absolutely relieable > > * change "dnf update" mode during system upgrade to > "dnf distro-sync --allowerasing" > > THAT is the right direction but nonsense because --allowerasing is a > terrible idea, anyways "dnf --releasever=XX distro-sync" is not > affected by both wrong solutions as far as i see (expect DNF is > intentionally or unintenioally broken elsewhere there) There are three options: (1, no distro-sync) — upgrade only packages which can be upgraded without conflicts. Leaves a partially upgraded system in some cases. (2, distro-sync) — upgrade packages which can be upgraded, remove conflicting ones. Lose some packages during upgrade. (3, force) — upgrade all packages ignoring conflicts. Leaves the system with some programs broken. You seem to dislike all the options, but I don't see anything else possible. Do you have some better proposal? (Note that the user is always asked for confirmation before proceeding, so she can always stop to remove/update packages by hand in all three cases.) Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
