Reindl Harald wrote: > it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the > confirmation the package not only works for you Sorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as relevant* for the decision whether to push the update as the presence or absence of reported issues. (That said, Bodhi rules are such that a generic +1 often *is* important because otherwise Bodhi won't let me push the update at all.) (In addition, a more precise statement what exactly was tested is also more useful than a generic "works for me", but I realize it can be hard to state this without wasting hours writing novels for many packages.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct