On Sex, 2015-10-16 at 09:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100 > Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the > > stable karma threshold: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4638 > > Well, the maintainers of those updates could choose to do so. > > Can you mail them about it? Hopefully the bodhi2 db would get fixed up > for these old updates, but maintainers should be able to push them, > it's just autokarma thats possibly messed up. yes , it is just autokarma thats messed up and push packages is one way to fix the problem ..., which is easier . > Or if you prefer I can mail them... Yeah I prefer . > > This doesn't reached the stable karma threshold but should also be > > pushed, because packages shouldn't stay in update testing forever ... > > Likewise these can be pushed by their submittors... > > THis first one: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7604 > > Is one of mine. I didn't push it because I am concerned about the > sa-timer issue mentioned in one of the comments. I couldn't duplicate > the issue, but wanted to see some more user comments before pushing to > stable. > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12402 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0189 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11499 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7171 > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/372 > > I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user=<yourusername>&status=testing > For their updates that are in testing. This kind of minor problems can happen because some people not care about their updates, my `dnf list extras` , sometimes have packages from updates-testing , that enter before GA (IIRC) and which never go to stable , so upgraded system (from beta) will have different packages of stable ISO , which is not good for testing, conclusion, IMHO, we should clean updates-testing from time to time, to sync testing users with stable users . Although after the GA can make sense to have packages in testing without going to the stable. Anyway not a big deal , is just my `dnf list extras` Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
