Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work,
> there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just a way to
> waste time.
10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my data" do not make a quality of +9.
They mean a package that should be unpushed ASAP and most definitely NEVER
be pushed to stable.
I mostly ignore generic "works for me" feedback with no details. It is not
useful. I mainly care about whether there was any legitimate negative
feedback or not. (Unfortunately, there is also plenty of invalid negative
feedback, e.g., regressions that are actually caused by other updates, "does
not fix bug #nnnnnnn" when it was never claimed to be fixed, etc.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
