2015-09-14 14:38 GMT+02:00 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > This case doesn't automatically mean that we should allow bundling. > Especially, if there are multiple consumers of the library in question. > A recent example is kwsys, which is bundled in every project released > by kitware. See bugs [1][2][3]. Another example is rawspeed, bundled > in three independent applications [4][5][6]. > Yes, and that's what we should be discussing! > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases where: > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedora yet > * no other Fedora package bundles it already > Interesting idea, unbundling on demand. I may ask what happens for heavily modified bundled libraries > However, the above puts the burden of unbundling on the second packager > who attempts to package something that bundles the same code. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251198 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251281 > [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251289 > [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248730 > [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248756 > [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972604 > > Regards, > Dominik In that aspect, that's the reason I want to encourage packages to work within SIGs to lessen the burden. H. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
