On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 11:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> To allow or not allow bundling is the small side point here - the >> questions >> should be more of "Are we a distribution of packages? Are we an OS? >> Where >> do we see the distribution/OS fit in how software is consumed and >> provided? >> Is that different for a Workstation vs an Atomic host?" Answer those >> big >> questions, and the questions on what to do along Ring0->RingN, what >> bundling >> to allow, etc. should fall out. > > Absolutely this. Can you please stand for election to something again? > :) Why? So he can be rendered less productive by attending meetings and dealing with distractions? Seriously, the questions Bill is asking do not need to be answered by some elected person/position. They need to be answered by the people DOing the work and I'm fairly skeptical that running for a Fedora committee is going to somehow increase the amount of work a person can do on a specific item. Put another way, there are a already a number of committees that those answers could come from or through and it does not require membership in any of them to submit proposals. It doesn't require membership in any committee. (Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have Bill back in a variety of ways. I just don't think getting elected is going to actually help.) josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
