W dniu 28.08.2015 o 18:02, Matěj Cepl pisze:
On 2015-08-28, 13:01 GMT, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:Yes, I have read it. But lot of maintainers did not. Example specfile: Source1: %{name}.score Patch0: %{name}-0.7.1-userpmopts.patch Patch1: %{name}-0.7.1-64bitfix.patch Patch2: %{name}-0.7.1-blit-crash.patchWell, perhaps instead of non-sensical (meaning, it cannot get to any meaningful resolution) discussion on devel, I would think that filing a bug could lead to something?
You mean mass bug reporting for each package where spec file lacks information about patches?
Prefer to spend that time on fixing those packages where aarch64 or other secondary architecture is not handled.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
