Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are there any plans on adding/enforcing such requirements at least for new > patches? > > Maintainers are not the only persons who work on their packages. Sometimes some > random developers go though random packages for several reasons (fixing ftbfs on > secondary architectures, mass rebuilds etc). There is also "bus factor" which > can wipe maintainer from existence or people just orphan own packages. > > Why we have to check patch after patch for their reason or upstream status? Have you read the existent policy on this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Patch_Guidelines Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpgSeGtnw7UP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
