Re: when DEP-3 compliant patches in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-08-28, 13:01 GMT, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Yes, I have read it. But lot of maintainers did not.
>
> Example specfile:
>
> Source1:        %{name}.score
> Patch0:         %{name}-0.7.1-userpmopts.patch
> Patch1:         %{name}-0.7.1-64bitfix.patch
> Patch2:         %{name}-0.7.1-blit-crash.patch

Well, perhaps instead of non-sensical (meaning, it cannot get to 
any meaningful resolution) discussion on devel, I would think 
that filing a bug could lead to something?

Matěj

-- 
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
I am a Roman Catholic, so that I do not expect `history' to be
anything but a `long defeat' -- though it contains (and in
a legend may contain more clearly and movingly) some samples or
glimpses of final victory.
      -- J.R.R. Tolkien

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux