* Martin Stransky [28/08/2015 12:21] : > > On 08/28/2015 11:40 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > >* Martin Stransky [28/08/2015 11:24] : > >> > >>Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would > >>need to modify the original extension? > > > >If there is a security issue with an extension, the packager might well > >want to distribute a patched version while waiting for a new release. > > That's possible but the update process in Fedora is recently too slow. Even > Firefox security updates sits in testing for week. I'm not seeing this, at least as a general rule. Most firefox updates seem to be pushed within a day. > I bet that official > update from AMO (mozilla extension site) will be way faster that Fedora > update. I suspect this will vary greatly depending on the maintainer and the security issue. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
