On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:12:25PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Their FAQ is constantly updated: > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing#FAQ > > I'm not sure if there is a valid practical reason to refuse submitting the > addons that we ship to their signing service or if it is against our > policies; at least mozilla-https-everywhere has been signed. that would work for Fedora - if it can be guaranteed that they sign new versions quickly. Immagine if one of our plugins had a security hole and mozilla would need days or weeks to sign it. As far as I can see Fedora specific extensions would have to be listed which means they would go through manual code review at mozilla. > Mozilla states that they will be offering an unbranded binary (en_US only) > for development and testing purposes. For me this appears the only possibility and I suspect there are more Fedora users like me maintaining their own Firefox extensions. So will we get a firefox-unbranded package? Richard -- Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
