Re: Firefox addon signing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have no real practical way to do this other than package up the addon and
> build it as a -unsigned package, then making a separate package that has the
> precompiled binary and signed by mozilla and put into the add on package.

Aren't the addons that we ship in fedora a bunch of text files zipped
in an xpi archive? It is kind of awkward to send them back and forth,
but if there are no other binaries, does it go against a particular
policy?

Or we could decide that we trust Mozilla's code review process and
drop packaging addons altogether, as was suggested. At least the users
will receive updates faster.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux