On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted. Can you please define "Fedora" and "self-hosted" as you use them above? Fedora is part of the larger open source community. Fedora Infrastructure uses 100% open source software. We don't however dictate to all those projects that they must also in turn use 100% open source tools and hosting. We can surely urge them to do so, but they are under no obligation to listen to us. > That said, Fedora should not start being rude and push people around > to get accounts on other commercial entities and to expose themselves > to the risks implied by this. Instead we should be rude and force developers of projects to do what we want? Anyhow, for the last time: github is currently the perferred way to report bodhi2 bugs. If you have some objection to them, you can file a fedorahosted ticket or infrastructure fedorahosted ticket. Also, I have been trying to file tickets on issues I see in mailing lists that aren't filed. Good day. kevin
Attachment:
pgpiZILrofKAQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
