On 08/20/2015 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:37 -0500
Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
else - period.
The last time a non-Fedora hosted / closed source service was
suggested it was shot down.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/191012.html
Have times changed? Using github is acceptable?
For what? :)
IMHO, I think projects should be free to choose whatever tools they
wish to build their project.
Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
That said, Fedora should not start being rude and push people around to
get accounts on other commercial entities and to expose themselves to
the risks implied by this.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
