On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/20/2015 03:13 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: >> >> If you have a bad experience that experience stays >> with you. Maybe you can get over it, maybe you can't. But a name does >> have history. > > > I guess, you guys are not aware that other names related to RH/CentOS/Fedora > also have "ambivalent" and "polarizing" connotations? > > Actually, I believe "rawhide" is the least one to worry about, because it > doesn't have any connotation to many people, because most users don't even > know what rawhide is. I agree with this. Often when I hear people make disparaging remarks about Fedora, using terms like "unstable", or "bleeding-edge", or "unreliable", and I ask them to elaborate, they almost always end up describing "rawhide", but use the name "Fedora". They don't know what "rawhide" is, but any negative connotations they've acquired, they've attributed to "Fedora", not to "rawhide". Granted, this is due to misunderstanding, but it leads me to agree that the name "rawhide" isn't important. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
