On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:16AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 31.07.2015 um 05:47 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>Radek Holy wrote: > >>>Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be > >>>fixed in dnf-1.0.2. > >> > >>I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even > >>after a successful update/install, deleting the cached packages is a major > >>data loss because it prevents downgrading to them later, after a broken new > >>update comes out (which also removes the previous update from the mirrors). > > > >Most people don't downgrade or do it very rarely? It can be > >said that downgrading is an advanced operation, and you can > >set keepcache=1 if you need it > > and then there are they cases where deps are solved but files > conflicts, the transaction check fails like recently with two broken > polkit updates > > have fun typing "dnf --skip-broken upgrade" (yes i know NF lacks > --skip-broken ATM) and download the other packages again for *zero > reason* That behaviour changed in dnf 1.0.2. So let's stop flogging this particular horse. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
